- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:00:41 -0500
- To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
<blockquote>
Joe writes:
<blockquote>
So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of dollars
every
year posting transcripts several days after the fact?
</blockquote>
Sorry: my first response was stupid and I apologize.
The answer, though, is that *if* a 24-hour talk radio station archives
its broadcasts and posts them to the Web, and *if* that station wants to
claim conformance to WCAG 2.0, then yes, I want them to post
transcripts. It's do-able. NPR does it. Voice of America does it.
I know those aren't 24-hour talk radio stations. Nevertheless, I do
think those transcripts should be required *if* the station wants to
claim conformance.
"Good design is accessible design."
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of John M Slatin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:54 pm
To: Joe Clark; WAI-GL
Subject: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
Joe writes:
<blockquote>
So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of dollars
every
year posting transcripts several days after the fact?
</blockquote>
No. Look at Example 8 in Wendy's proposal, please.
"Good design is accessible design."
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Clark
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:43 pm
To: WAI-GL
Subject: Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
> It's just audio. So it's not covered by GL 1.2. It would
> be covered by GL 1.1 L1 SC2, which requires a text transcript for
> *audio
> only* in my view (not for multimedia, which *is* covered under 1.2.
So you want 24-hour talk-radio stations to spend millions of dollars
every
year posting transcripts several days after the fact?
How does this enhance accessibility?
Ask around. Online radio stations are not a priority for deaf people.
Video is.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
--This.
--What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:00:44 UTC