public-html@w3.org from March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 9122] Obsolete but Conforming bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9061] allow image maps on the canvas element. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9061] allow image maps on the canvas element. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• Change proposals uploaded to Wiki - URLs, suggestions on Issue 92 table Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: All change proposals should now be submitted Shelley Powers
• Re: All change proposals should now be submitted Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• All change proposals should now be submitted Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-100 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-97 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-96 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-95 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-94 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-93 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-92 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-91 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-90 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• RE: FW: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: creating issues for non-published documents? Steven Faulkner
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Steven Faulkner
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Henri Sivonen
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Henri Sivonen
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: FW: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Larry Masinter
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

• Re: FW: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Jonas Sicking
• FW: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Larry Masinter
• Re: creating issues for non-published documents? Shelley Powers
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Shelley Powers
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-04-01: action items, decision policy update, issue status Sam Ruby
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Edward O'Connor
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Julian Reschke
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Julian Reschke
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: creating issues for non-published documents? Maciej Stachowiak
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-04-01: action items, decision policy update, issue status Paul Cotton
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 8321] change controller for HTML media type bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [minutes] 20100325 HTML teleconference Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Shelley Powers
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: creating issues for non-published documents? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Maciej Stachowiak
• creating issues for non-published documents? Shelley Powers
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility; X3D Don Brutzman
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Julian Reschke
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Richard Ishida
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
• [Bug 8784] politics in <param> example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• RE: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Dean Leigh
• Re: Make reset button non-conforming Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: Make reset button non-conforming Jonas Sicking
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 8207] Change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7391] Reference to WEBADDRESS should be replaced with reference to IRIbis bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8246] what about IE parsing problems? http://html5doctor.com/dd-details-wrong-again/ bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Silvia Pfeiffer
• [Bug 6853] restore meta keywords, search engines use them bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9160] input['type=checkbox'].checkValidity ought to work like the radio type, testing the whole checkbox group, not each checkbox individually bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Ian Hickson

Monday, 29 March 2010

• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Michael A. Puls II
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Aryeh Gregor
• [Bug 9081] Confusing alt text in the fourth The Lady of Shalott example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9077] Lady of Shalott example doesn't really "enhance the themes or subject matter of the page content" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9077] Lady of Shalott example doesn't really "enhance the themes or subject matter of the page content" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 9081] Confusing alt text in the fourth The Lady of Shalott example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 have changed focus of change proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm Philip Jägenstedt

Sunday, 28 March 2010

• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Some bugs filed based on conformance error study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Michael A. Puls II
• The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• [Bug 7682] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same organization across many sites bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 7681] link tag: rel: associate pages about the same person across many sites bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6610] add a preventable forced-fragment method bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6609] negative keywords-not meta tags bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: co-chairs: question about change proposals for Issues 90 and 91 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Boris Zbarsky
• co-chairs: question about change proposals for Issues 90 and 91 Shelley Powers
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Lars Gunther
• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Lars Gunther
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: Make reset button non-conforming Lars Gunther
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Lars Gunther
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Lars Gunther
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Lars Gunther
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Kornel Lesiński
• Make reset button non-conforming Kornel Lesiński
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Some bugs filed based on conformance error study Joe D Williams

Saturday, 27 March 2010

• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Karl Dubost

Sunday, 28 March 2010

• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli

Saturday, 27 March 2010

• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Some bugs filed based on conformance error study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Michael A. Puls II
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Adam Barth
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Adam Barth
• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal Michael A. Puls II
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for Volunteers: Polyglot spec Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: document.load: History and a proposal timeless
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Anne van Kesteren
• Re: AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Karl Dubost
• AuthConfReq: Presentational Markup Sam Ruby
• Bug 7034 - Thanks! Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Karl Dubost
• document.load: History and a proposal Adam Barth

Friday, 26 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Benoit Piette
• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• Request for Volunteers: Polyglot spec Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Tab Atkins Jr.
• ISSUE-89 Change Proposal Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Ian Hickson
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 James Graham
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• elevate bug 7034 to issue Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Jirka Kosek
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Revisions of Decision Policy document under way Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-03-25: decision policy, issue status, updates from meetings, task force reports CE Whitehead

Thursday, 25 March 2010

• Re: order of arguments in window.postMessage() Ian Hickson
• Re: Presentational markup Ian Hickson
• Re: Presentational markup Sam Ruby
• Re: waiting and seeking events in media element seek algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: Presentational markup Ian Hickson
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw Ian Hickson
• RE: Default value of "preload" attribute John Foliot
• Re: Change proposal template and conformance class changes Maciej Stachowiak
• Change proposal template and conformance class changes Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-03-25: decision policy, issue status, updates from meetings, task force reports Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Presentational markup Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Presentational markup Sam Ruby
• Re: Presentational markup Anne van Kesteren
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw Robert O'Callahan
• Re: media element seek algorithm: don't throw Ian Hickson
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Default value of "preload" attribute John Foliot
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Yves Lafon
• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Silvia Pfeiffer

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

• Re: Default value of "preload" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Presentational markup Sam Ruby
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Tab Atkins Jr.
• Presentational markup (was: Re: Bug 7034) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <strike> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Default value of "preload" attribute Robert O'Callahan
• Re: <strike> Sam Ruby
• <strike> (was: Re: Bug 7034) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-31 and ISSUE-80 Change Proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Aryeh Gregor
• Voice on the Web - message from the Voice Browser/Multimodal Interaction WGs Kazuyuki Ashimura
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Dean Leigh
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-31 and ISSUE-80 Change Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-31 and ISSUE-80 Change Proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: priority of bugs changed...again Shelley Powers
• CORRECTION ISSUE-78 (urls-terminology): Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-78 (meta-name-registry): Chairs Solicit Proposals Karl Dubost
• Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Shelley Powers
• Re: priority of bugs changed...again Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Old resolved bugs Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Kornel Lesinski
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Philip Taylor
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Philip Taylor
• Re: Bug 7034 Anne van Kesteren
• RE: INVALID_STATE_ERR or INVALID_ACCESS_ERR when attempting to write into XML documents Ian Hickson
• RE: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Dean Leigh
• Re: Bug 7034 James Graham
• ISSUE-78 (meta-name-registry): Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-41: Generalization of approach taken by SVG and MathML Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-31 and ISSUE-80 Change Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Maciej Stachowiak
• Null change proposals for ISSUE-31, ISSUE-41, ISSUE-80, and ISSUE-88 Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Simon Pieters
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Jirka Kosek
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Julian Reschke
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Update on HTML 5 Document License (ACTION-29) Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 David Singer
• ISSUE 79 editorial changes Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: priority of bugs changed...again Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 8872] split out and modify parts of Section 4.8.2.1 the img element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• priority of bugs changed...again Shelley Powers
• Re: Bug 7034 Philip Taylor
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Henri Sivonen
• Proposal for ISSUE-41: Generalization of approach taken by SVG and MathML Ennals, Robert
• HTML's table model vs @hidden & display:none Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers

Monday, 22 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Laura Carlson
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Laura Carlson
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Edward O'Connor
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• RE: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Ennals, Robert
• Re: Bug 7034 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Edward O'Connor
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Bug 7034 James Graham
• RE: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Ennals, Robert
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Philip Taylor
• RE: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Ennals, Robert
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Ennals, Robert
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Philip Taylor
• Re: Bug 7034 Philip Taylor
• Possible Conservative Proposal : no prefixes, but allow xmlns on a root element Ennals, Robert
• Re: restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 James Graham
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
• Re: Bug 7034 Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Henri Sivonen
• RE: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Dean Leigh
• Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 21 March 2010

• ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure Shelley Powers
• i18n tests for HTML Richard Ishida
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Henry S. Thompson
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Sam Ruby
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• restrictions on blocks inside inlines (was Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study) L. David Baron
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Karl Dubost
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Shelley Powers
• Re: HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Sam Ruby
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Laura Carlson
• HTML5 Authoring Conformance Study Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 20 March 2010

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: Bug 7034 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• FW: [EAI] EAI Agenda for IETF 77 in Anaheim: mailto: URI scheme Larry Masinter

Friday, 19 March 2010

• Re: Bug 7034 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 Sam Ruby
• Re: Bug 7034 (was: Possible *third* proposal) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Bug 7034 (was: Possible *third* proposal) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML (rename BDI by SCE) Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• Bug 7034 (was: Possible *third* proposal) Sam Ruby
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Sam Ruby
• [Bug 9280] Add default button option/attribute for forms bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 18 March 2010

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Possible *third* proposal for ISSUE-41 Distributed Extensibility Ennals, Robert
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Shelley Powers
• Re: Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Shelley Powers
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility David Singer
• ANN: IETF HTTPbis Working Group Meeting next monday Julian Reschke
• Patial Change request proposal for Issue 74 Canvas accessibility Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Henri Sivonen
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Philip Taylor
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Change proposal for issue 103, was: ISSUE-103 change proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Jonas Sicking
• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ennals, Robert
• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Tony Ross

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Indeterministic progress bar Ian Hickson
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML (rename BDI by SCE) Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Matt May
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• Re: Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Maciej Stachowiak
• Change Proposals for ISSUE-41 (D.E.) vs XHTML and IE9 Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-103 change proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Robert O'Callahan
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: no change Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Indeterministic progress bar Yael.Aharon@nokia.com
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Jonas Sicking
• Re: Indeterministic progress bar Tab Atkins Jr.

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

• RE: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ennals, Robert
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: Indeterministic progress bar Ian Hickson
• Re: problem with bugzilla? Maciej Stachowiak
• problem with bugzilla? Shelley Powers
• [Bug 7525] meta/@name=keywords should be specified (and made conforming) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Indeterministic progress bar Yael.Aharon@nokia.com
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-79, was: ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Julian Reschke
• [Bug 9239] specify a convention for preventing vendor-specific non-standard extensions from clashing with themselves and future standard development bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ian Hickson
• TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility Ennals, Robert

Monday, 15 March 2010

• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows" Robin Berjon
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Joe D Williams
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML (rename BDI by SCE) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML (rename BDI by SCE) Najib Tounsi
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Simon Pieters
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Joe D Williams
• [Bug 7539] Since @summary is an official part of the table element, it is no longer obsolete. Suffienct warning language exists in it's definition that this entry should be removed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Simon Pieters

Saturday, 13 March 2010

• Default button control names? Ersin Akinci

Monday, 15 March 2010

• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Joe D Williams
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Silvia Pfeiffer
• [Bug 7076] Client-side image maps attributes missing on the a element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 14 March 2010

• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Silvia Pfeiffer
• [Bug 7391] Reference to WEBADDRESS should be replaced with reference to IRIbis bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Joe D Williams
• [Bug 7386] SharedWorkerGlobalScope bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Old resolved bugs Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 7056] <caption> and <figure><legend> elements should allow flow content children bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 7056] <caption> and <figure><legend> elements should allow flow content children bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> Joe D Williams
• [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 13 March 2010

• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-103 change proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: ISSUE-103 change proposal Jens O. Meiert
• Re: ISSUE-103 change proposal Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-103 change proposal Shelley Powers
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: Re-registration of text/html Ennals, Robert
• RE: new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Ennals, Robert
• Re: ISSUE-95 hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Mark Nottingham

Friday, 12 March 2010

• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• [Bug 9098] Correct the img element definition. Replace with suggested text. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Phillips, Addison
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Richard Ishida
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Richard Ishida
• [Bug 9233] Incorporate a Link to UAAG with appropriate wording into browser sections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Shelley Powers
• Re: Breakdown of issues Sam Ruby
• Breakdown of issues Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Simon Pieters
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Simon Pieters
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Simon Pieters
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Jonas Sicking
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Simon Pieters
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Setting IDL attributes that map enumerated content attributes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: *Disregard* W3C Account and HTMLWG Participation "Unlinked" Jace Voracek
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• W3C Account and HTMLWG Participation "Unlinked" Jace Voracek
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Laura Carlson

Thursday, 11 March 2010

• Re: new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Sam Ruby
• new dates for issue items based on today's HTML WG teleconference Shelley Powers
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-79 (meta-keywords): Call for Consensus Sam Ruby
• Re: Setting IDL attributes that map enumerated content attributes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Setting IDL attributes that map enumerated content attributes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Setting IDL attributes that map enumerated content attributes Tab Atkins Jr.
• Setting IDL attributes that map enumerated content attributes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
• Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Re-registration of text/html Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• RE: Re-registration of text/html Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Henri Sivonen
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Julian Reschke
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Martin J. Dürst
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Roy T. Fielding
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? CE Whitehead
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Nicholas Stimpson
• RE: ISSUE-88 / Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

• RE: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Larry Masinter
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Jonas Sicking
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows" Tantek Celik
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Kornel Lesinski
• warning: redirect test cases broken, was: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Tantek Çelik
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Julian Reschke
• Re: The cite element in H:TML draft and Differences draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Julian Reschke
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Julian Reschke
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Laura Carlson
• Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster
• Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8716] Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers with Suggested Text for Short Text Alternatives bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 8646] Private communication exception bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6496] Allow <img aria-labelledby> to act as a text alternative bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: DRAFT Anaheim agenda Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows" Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques John Foliot
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Matt May
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Ian Hickson
• Re: <video> attributes and children Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: no change Shelley Powers
• Re: a suggestion and a request on bugs and change proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: a suggestion and a request on bugs and change proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• a suggestion and a request on bugs and change proposals Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: no change Shelley Powers
• ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: no change Ian Hickson
• Old resolved bugs Maciej Stachowiak
• Bug stats update Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 8 March 2010

• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The cite element in H:TML draft and Differences draft Michael(tm) Smith
• The cite element in H:TML draft and Differences draft Jeremy Keith
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Matitiahu Allouche
• FW: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 Paul Cotton
• RE: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Richard Ishida
• RE: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Richard Ishida
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 7 March 2010

• RE: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Phillips, Addison
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Sam Ruby
• Re: <video> attributes and children Joe D Williams
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: H:TML Feedback (Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration - object Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: <video> attributes and children David Singer
• Re: <video> attributes and children Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: <video> attributes and children David Singer
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Color Management in HTML5? Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Color Management in HTML5? Leonard Rosenthol

Saturday, 6 March 2010

• RE: Color Management in HTML5? Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Laura Carlson
• Re: <video> attributes and children Maciej Stachowiak
• <video> attributes and children Joe D Williams

Friday, 5 March 2010

• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Robert O'Callahan
• Re: FW: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? L. David Baron
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Ian Hickson
• [Bug 9197] Remove unnecessary editorialization in acknowledgement section bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Color Management in HTML5? Frank Olivier
• ISSUE-94 and significant editing changes to specification since issue was created Shelley Powers
• FPWD of Additional Requirements for Bidi in HTML Richard Ishida
• Re: Color Management in HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Color Management in HTML5? Leonard Rosenthol

Thursday, 4 March 2010

• RE: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals Ennals, Robert
• Re: ISSUE-41: decentralized-extensibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Silvia Pfeiffer
• Call for Exclusions - HTML: The Markup Language Ian Jacobs
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Sam Ruby
• HTML WG Working Drafts have been published Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Laura Carlson
• [minutes] HTML WG 2010004 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-55 profile by amicable resolution Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Shelley Powers
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Laura Carlson
• RE: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Paul Cotton
• Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Laura Carlson
• RE: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Paul Cotton
• Re: links with the HTML5 spec are messed up Shelley Powers
• Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals) Laura Carlson
• change proposal: Provide accessibility implementation information (in the Canvas 2d Context specification) for focus rectangle and caret Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: links with the HTML5 spec are messed up Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: links with the HTML5 spec are messed up Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Adam Barth
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Adam Barth
• links with the HTML5 spec are messed up Shelley Powers
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Ian Hickson
• RE: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Leonard Rosenthol

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Ian Hickson
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Julian Reschke
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Ian Hickson
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Laura Carlson
• apologies for test <eom> John Foliot
• RE: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals John Foliot
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-03-04: actions, publications, decision policy, issues Paul Cotton
• RE: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals John Foliot
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Julian Reschke
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Laura Carlson
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Edward O'Connor
• Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref) Julian Reschke
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Matt May
• Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals David Singer
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Schemas and validation Joe D Williams
• ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-104 (sniffing-optional): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-102 (meta-name-registry): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-99 (meta-scheme): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Leif Halvard Silli
• Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-79 (meta-keywords): Call for Consensus Sam Ruby
• ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Sam Ruby
• Re: CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Re-registration of text/html Dan Connolly
• CfC: Adopt Change Proposal for Issue-27 (rel-ownership) Sam Ruby
• Re: Schemas and validation Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration - object Joe D Williams

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Paul Cotton
• Re: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Paul Cotton
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Paul Cotton
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Ian Hickson
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Paul Cotton
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Ian Hickson
• RE: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Paul Cotton
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Schemas and validation Jirka Kosek
• Re: Schemas and validation Sam Ruby
• Re: Schemas and validation Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals Julian Reschke
• Re: Schemas and validation Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: Schemas and validation Sam Ruby
• Re: Schemas and validation Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Steven Faulkner
• Re: use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Karl Dubost
• Re: use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Ian Hickson
• Re: H:TML draft for FPWD consideration - object Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Anne van Kesteren
• use of title attributes in HTML5 spec. Steven Faulkner
• Re: Counter change-proposal for ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) David Singer
• Re: change proposal: Allow the a element to have ARIA role attribute values other than link Steven Faulkner
• Re: FW: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: change proposal: Allow the a element to have ARIA role attribute values other than link Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Schemas and validation Henri Sivonen
• Re: Schemas and validation Joe D Williams
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Schemas and validation Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Manu Sporny
• Re: Schemas and validation Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: Schemas and validation Jonas Sicking

Monday, 1 March 2010

• Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: Schemas and validation Joe D Williams
• Re: Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Ian Hickson
• Editors, please prepare drafts for publication on Thursday, March 4 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: change proposal: Allow the a element to have ARIA role attribute values other than link Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Schemas and validation Sam Ruby
• Schemas and validation Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Joe D Williams
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Henri Sivonen
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Henri Sivonen
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Julian Reschke
• Re: Please vote on the canvas accessibility proposal Steven Faulkner
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Henri Sivonen
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Sam Ruby
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Krzysztof Maczyński
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Ian Hickson
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Larry Masinter
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Larry Masinter
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Larry Masinter
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) (vs. ISSUE-30 longdesc) Toby Inkster

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 23:45:16 UTC