W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Bug 7034

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:04:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4BA58CBA.6080508@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Ennals, Robert" <robert.ennals@intel.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/20/2010 09:04 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Or to put it another way, I don't see a compelling case here for not
> following the Decision Policy guidelines on what should go in a bug.

To the contrary:

1) I believe that the data I have provided demonstrates that there is a 
clear and substantial problem with the Author Conformance Requirements.

2) The problem is Author Conformance Requirements.

3) As you indicated this problem is pervasive throughout the spec.

4) One suggested way is to remove them entirely.

At this point, I believe that the decision process calls for a "A 
rationale for the change or lack of change".

> Regards,
> Maciej

- Sam Ruby
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 03:05:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC