On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:03:59 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@målform.no> wrote: > When it comes to maintenance and file size, then I think I have seen in > your blog, Anne, positive nods to people that picked elements that was > shorter ... At any rate, I don't see that <strike>txt</strike> takes up > more bytes than e.g. <span > style="text-decoration:line-through">txt</span>. <strike> is more > specific than <span>. Which is a good thing, and also makes it "more > semantic", so to speak. This thread started out about whether it was a good idea that xmlns="..." was a good validator mode switch. It seems you are instead arguing for retaining some presentational elements. Did you file a bug on introducing <strike> again in the draft? I'm not really opposed to that personally. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:14:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:14 UTC