W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:42:48 -0700
Message-ID: <dd0fbad1003180742y5cfe3d7aw4796d00dc894ca55@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Robert Ennals <robert.ennals@intel.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> Have vendor-prefixed versions of CSS properties ever been gotten rid of once
> deployed? (I honestly don't know - WebKit certainly supports some versions
> of properties with a prefix that we have also supported unprefixed for some
> time.)
> Are there significant negative consequences from the continued existence of
> vendor-prefixed CSS properties in implementations?

Apparently it is standard Mozilla policy to dump the vendor prefix a
version or two after they implement the unprefixed version.  This is
basically hearsay, though; you'll need a Mozilla employee to confirm.

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 14:43:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:13 UTC