Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)

On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:52:42 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I can't say that I agree with that reasoning. IMHO interoperability
> going forward is more important than not declaring currently
> conforming implementations non-conforming. If anyone gets really sad
> for loosing their conforming badge, I can send them some home made
> cookies ;)

Yes please! :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 19:09:43 UTC