- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:40:28 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, HTMLwg WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:33:31 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> >>> Also, do we really still need to have arguments over why >>> transitional doctypes are bad (they trigger an inferior rendering >>> mode for one) and why presentational markup is to be avoided? >> >> I think I understand the value of avoiding quirks mode and almost >> standards mode, enough to explain it. I'm not sure I understand fully >> why presentational markup is to be avoided. Can you provide some >> reasons or point to a good reference? >> >> I ask because I'm planning to make a wiki page that collects >> rationales for authoring conformance requirements. > > Ian posted about this a while back: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0961.html Awesome, thanks for the reference! - Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 10:41:03 UTC