- From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:37:19 -0700
- To: <public-html@w3.org>, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>
Joe >> This follows the model set by <object> and could result in use of the following construction: .<video autoplay controls> <source src="tgif.vid"> <source src="lgif.zvid"> <p><a href="tgif.vid">Download the video file.from this link.</a></p> </video> >> In this example if the UA recognizes <video ...> but does not >> recognize vid content then the the potential fallback video >> content .zvid will be tried. If still no go, then the html >> "fallback" content enclosed in <p> element would be shown >> according to the <video>, <p>, and <<a> styles. Simon > No, it wouldn't. OK, I must be really off in my thinking of how it could work. SInce I haven't found an example in the spec that is giving me understanding (or changing my preconceptions), please tell me if the above is even a legitimate contruction, and how you are expecting <video> to work. The following description of the example did not get a comment so I am supposing that thie following is a reasonable description of what should happen if <video> is not recognized by the (legacy) UA at all. : >> In this example if the UA did not recognize the <video> element >> then the html "fallback" content enclosed in <p> and <a> element >> would be shown. This operation is more than just a specification >> for <video>, <audio>, or <object> but just intrinsically how the >> web UA should work: Skip elements that are not in the vocabulary. >> So, here, an old UA would just naturally skip <video ... >, <source >> ... >, and <source ... > and end up showing the html link according >> to the <p> and <a> style, although the UA will probalbly also apply >> CSS specified for <video>.. This seemed reasonable to me for this example because I suppose in this case the UA follows the same sort of rules as <object>. Now, again for this case where the <video> is recognized but none of the <source> resources work: >> In this example if the UA recognizes <video ...> but does not >> recognize .vid content then the the potential fallback video >> content .zvid will be tried. If still no go, then the html >> "fallback" content enclosed in <p> element would be shown according to the <video>, <p>, and <a> styles. Please tell me what actually should happen in the case where none of the listed <videdo> resources are playable. Thank You and Best Regards, Joe .
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 12:38:04 UTC