W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:22:33 -0500
Message-ID: <643cc0271003161922n577fae2y52914a18b4f6d7ad@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Shelley,
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>
>  To make this official, I plan on submitting a counter proposal to this
>> secondary proposal that Ian Hickson has proposed.
>>
>> I won't be continuing support for Matt's initial proposal. I'll start
>> fresh, and provide my own arguments against what Ian is proposing in this,
>> and his other proposal.
>>
>> I'll submit the new change proposal within a month's time.
>>
>
> The Chairs discussed this. We think it would not be helpful to the group to
> have a second Change Proposal that requests the exact same change. We
> encourage you to work with Matt to help him revise his proposal, and add any
> additional rationale that you think would be helpful.
>

I'm willing to stay with Matt's initial proposal, as long as he doesn't
remove it.

If Matt's initial proposal, to remove the paragraph, continues being a
viable change proposal, I will continue to support it, as is. If Matt does
drop his support for the change proposal, then I ask that it be continued,
and I'll provide any support for it that it needs.



>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>
Shelley
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 02:23:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC