- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:04:00 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Friday 2010-03-05 00:08 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Just to report on what Safari does: we colormatch images that are > tagged with an explicit colorspace, but we treat CSS colors and > colors in untagged images as being in the device color space > (instead of treating as sRGB). This seems to give a good balance > between performance for the common case and color-correctness for > cases where precise color is desired. Gecko does this too (I think starting in Firefox 3.5?), but we got quite a few complaints about it, and I'd like to change it. It has the significant disadvantage that the relationships between colors in different parts of the same page can be different depending on the device (when a page has both tagged images and other colors). I think we should move towards treating CSS colors (and untagged images) as sRGB, as CSS1, CSS2.1, and css3-color require. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 22:04:31 UTC