W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Closing issues. Setting and meeting deadlines. (was Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 03:30:32 -0600
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa1003060130l3cc15f50h5d91add9886f64e2@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Paul,

On 3/4/10, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually the main points that I wanted confirmation of, are  the
> second two bullets.
> * If the change proposal is not done by the deadline, the issue will
> be closed without prejudice and DEFERRED to the NEXT VERSION of HTML.
> * An issue that is closed without prejudice in this way can only be
> re-raised with approval of the HTML Chairs. It is an ENDPOINT for the
> escalation process.
> Are these correct?

Larry filed a bug [1] in relation to this so it doesn't fall through the cracks.

Best Regards,

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187

Full HTML WG Process Bug List is:

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Saturday, 6 March 2010 09:31:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:13 UTC