- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 03:30:32 -0600
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Paul, On 3/4/10, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually the main points that I wanted confirmation of, are the > second two bullets. > > * If the change proposal is not done by the deadline, the issue will > be closed without prejudice and DEFERRED to the NEXT VERSION of HTML. > > * An issue that is closed without prejudice in this way can only be > re-raised with approval of the HTML Chairs. It is an ENDPOINT for the > escalation process. > > Are these correct? Larry filed a bug [1] in relation to this so it doesn't fall through the cracks. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187 Full HTML WG Process Bug List is: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&component=working+group+Decision+Policy -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Saturday, 6 March 2010 09:31:06 UTC