- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:50:05 -0400
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 27 mars 2010 à 19:37, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit : > <b> is allowed per HTML5. Should it only permit <strong>? Either way, I do not mind. my personal preference: strong is enough. > I also think that it is possible to transmit, in a screenreader, that > the text is striked over. <strike title="this text is striked for reason x">blabla</strike> >> One size doesn't fit all. Some users need a markup validity check >> feedback, some users are just not tech savy and in this case, the >> system *should* take care of it. Unfortunately for me, here, I used >> should. :) > > Should the commenter in this case not have been allowed put a strike > over the text? Not sure I understand the question. It depends on how you design the language. Is strike permitted in the language? 1. If strike element is forbidden/obsolete in the html language. Not allowed 2. If strike element is authorized but as the Web site publisher/developer, we think the element is not appropriate in the context of the input form. Not allowed -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:09:30 UTC