W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

RE: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:29:16 -0800 (PST)
To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Matt May'" <mattmay@adobe.com>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016101cabff1$191090a0$4b31b1e0$@edu>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>
> Shelley's intent notwithstanding, I'd still like to hear
> from others who were part of the original discussion.

I am cautiously watching what replacement language emerges, given that Ian
has shown a willingness to work with Matt's suggestions.  I steadfastly
maintain that the spec should reference, as the definitive go-to location,
WCAG Success Criteria.

As I recall from the last round of discussions, making this provision was
solidly supported by the majority of those involved in the thread. (And I
think that it is and would be wholly appropriate that the HTML WG request
that WAI ensure that this and other sections of the Success Criteria
document collection be maintained and updated to reflect emergent
solutions in HTML5 and future specifications.)

So for now, I am sitting on the sidelines, quietly watching for the next
moves.

JF
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 01:29:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC