W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

(unknown charset) Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:36:03 +0100
To: (unknown charset) "Ennals, Robert" <robert.ennals@intel.com>
Cc: (unknown charset) HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100316113603738958.e6a578d8@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Ennals, Robert, Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:28:11 +0000:

> while Y doesn't (authors should write <tag prefix-foo> ...

<tag prefix-foo>  becomes <TAG prefix-foo=""> in the DOM. 

Hence, <tag prefix="foo" > seems like a better proposal, as there then 
would be congruence between syntax and DOM.  

And, "_" instead of "-" seems better since "-" is already in use in 
@data- and in @aria-. A "-" doesn't stand out as an extension as 
strongly as "_" would do. Being an attribute, more rules follows 
"naturally": There should probably only be one value inside each 
attribute, for instance.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 10:36:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC