On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 11.03.2010 16:38, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Should we recommend the behavior we see implemented (SHOULD? MUST?)? Note >>> that this would make current implementations of Opera and Safari >>> non-compliant. >> >> Is there a reason to use SHOULD rather than MUST? If not I'd say use MUST. > > Usually we don't add normative requirements on top of RFC 2616, unless we're > clearly fixing a bug (which is not the case here), or are confident that > we're just writing down what everybody is doing anyway. Why? Isn't the point of a spec to encourage interoperable behavior? / JonasReceived on Thursday, 11 March 2010 17:22:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC