- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:37:12 +0100
- To: "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, "'Toby Inkster'" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "'Adam Barth'" <w3c@adambarth.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:22:17 +0100, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: > I didn't mean XSD specifically, it could be RelaxNG (as being used by > the SVG committee, for example). > > I understand that text/html(5) is not to be validated by an XML > validation tool, but as text/xhtml(5) has to be valid and conforming XML > - then I would expect some schema against which it could be validated... Why is prose not enough? (There's no text/xhtml by the way, just application/xhtml+xml.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 10:38:18 UTC