W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003031929370.30667@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> The current status for this issue, we have a proposal to update section 2.5.1
> to bring it in alignment with the IRI specification:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0882.html
> 
> The current draft for section 2.5.1 can be found here:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#terminology-0

Note that this is an escalation of this bug:

   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8207

...which was not rejected. I don't think anyone disagrees with the 
proposal, the problem is just that the text to be referenced -- the new 
IRI spec -- isn't done yet, so it's not possible to know _how_ to update 
the HTML5 spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 19:32:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC