W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-101 (us-ascii-ref)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003240450520.4116@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > 
> > - That being said, I think a reference to ISO/IEC 646 would be 
> > acceptable as well; this one is re-published by ECMA as ECMA-006, 
> > which is available online 
> > (<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-006.htm>)
> 
> Ian, would a reference to ISO/IEC 646 aka ECMA-006 be acceptable to you?

I think debating this is a waste of our time and am not willing to get 
drawn into a discussion of the topic.


> I am trying to determine if we need a call for consensus or a call for 
> counter-proposals as the next step.

The next step should be to reprimand Julian for wasting our time and to 
dismiss the issue as a trivial matter not worth the electrons used to 
raise it. Humouring people who raise such trivial issues will only lead to 
an escalation of the level of time-wasting this group has to deal with.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 04:55:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:00 UTC