Re: Some bugs filed based on conformance error study

The review of conformance errors on the sites listed above is now  

In addition to the following bugs:

On Mar 27, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> - "Make <nobr> element conforming" < 
> >
> - "Make <wbr> element conforming" < 
> >
> - "Make unescaped & conforming in attribute values in some cases" < 
> >
> - "Do not interpret & followed by an entity name followed by = as an  
> entity reference in attribute values" < 
> >
> (This one is a proposed change to implementation requirements, not  
> authoring requirements. It would reduce the possible risk from the  
> change proposed in bug 9352.)
> - "autocomplete=off should be allowed and should work on non-<input>  
> form controls" <>
> (Would affect implementation requirements as well as authoring  
> requirements.)
> - "Leading/trailing whitespace in attributes that take a URL should  
> be conforming" <>

I have filed the following additional spec bugs:

* bug 9358: Explanation of content model requirements could be improved
* bug 9359: hspace and vspace attributes should be listed in obsolete  
* bug 9360: <iframe allowTransparency> should be mentioned in the  
obsolete section
* bug 9361: script element should be allowed essentially anywhere

I linked all of the above on the wiki page, in addition to these two  
bugs filed by others that seemed related:

* bug 7468: make <table border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0">  
* bug 9355: Obsolete presentational markup should be conforming

The bugs are all listed here:

I also filed the following validator bug:

* "Error incorrectly reported for iframe with 0 width and height" < 

If anyone else wants to go over the data and see if there are more  
bugs to file, I encourage you to do so, and to link any bugs you file  
on the wiki page. The same goes for any other authoring conformance  
bugs of a similar nature. Also, please feel free to comment in any of  
the bugs cited above.


Received on Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:55:58 UTC