W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Bug 7034

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:58:21 -0700
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Ennals, Robert" <robert.ennals@intel.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <EA282055-DADC-4454-BB5A-2106921BD1FB@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> [co-chair hat off]
> My request is for rationale.  I assume there is a coherent strategy  
> behind this, but I don't see it.  Each time I take a closer look, I  
> find what appears to me to be glaring inconsistencies.
>> Incidentally, I think I would personally agree with both of the two
>> specific points above.
> My request is for rationale.  If there is a good rationale for these  
> points that fits with a larger strategy, then I would disagree with  
> both of those specific points above.
> What you are asking me to do to take guesses as to what the intent  
> is for the authoring requirements, take pot shots at the spec  
> without this necessary understanding, see what falls over when I do,  
> and then repeat the process until either nothing is left standing or  
> what is left standing does have consensus.
> That does not seem like a sane alternative to me.

What I'm asking is that you follow the Decision Policy guidelines for  
what should go in a bug: <http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#bugzilla-bug 
 >. I don't think bug 7034 satisfies any of those four bullet points  
in its current state.

And I'm letting you know that if the bug report doesn't meet those  
guidelines, the likely result is NEEDSINFO, and that I at least would  
agree with that resolution. If you're not interested in doing anything  
further to avoid that outcome, then I am satisfied to leave the bug  

Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 21:58:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:13 UTC