- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:32:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Cc: masinter@adobe.com
I just re-read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html Point #4 talks about polyglot documents and point #10 talks about XML editing workflows. Is there verifiable existence proof of a pre-existing XML editing workflow that: 1) Would not work if <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> were used. AND 2) Already produces otherwise text/html-safe output (e.g. doesn't output <div/> or <br></br> and doesn't use namespace prefixes). AND 3) Would work with if the doctype <!DOCTYPE PUBLIC "-//W3C HTMLWG hixie//NONSGML HTML 20100401//EN" "about:legacy-compat"> were used. ? (Observation: Either way, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with *versioning*--just with the ability of claimed existing XML editing workflows to deal with particular syntax.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 09:32:44 UTC