W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows"

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:32:09 -0800 (PST)
To: public-html@w3.org
Cc: masinter@adobe.com
Message-ID: <1061333963.35483.1268213529642.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
I just re-read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html

Point #4 talks about polyglot documents and point #10 talks about XML editing workflows.

Is there verifiable existence proof of a pre-existing XML editing workflow that:
 1) Would not work if <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> were used.
AND
 2) Already produces otherwise text/html-safe output (e.g. doesn't output <div/> or <br></br> and doesn't use namespace prefixes).
AND
 3) Would work with if the doctype <!DOCTYPE PUBLIC "-//W3C HTMLWG hixie//NONSGML HTML 20100401//EN" "about:legacy-compat"> were used.
?

(Observation: Either way, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with *versioning*--just with the ability of claimed existing XML editing workflows to deal with particular syntax.)

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 09:32:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC