- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:17:27 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
The reasons given for disallowing presentational markup given are: - The use of presentational elements leads to poorer accessibility - Higher cost of maintenance - Higher document sizes To explore this, I offer this nearly perfect specimen of markup: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/06/30/irony And draw attention to two parts: <b style="background:transparent;color:red">1984</b> <strike>the</strike> The former conforms to the author conformance requirements present in the document. How does this lead to greater accessibility than the alternative? How does it reduce maintenance costs? How does it reduce document sizes? The latter does not conform to the author conformance requirements present in the document. How is this less accessible than the alternative? How does it increase maintenance costs? How does it increase document sizes? - Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2010 12:17:49 UTC