W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE-90 background documentation on allowing any flow content in figure

From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:36:50 -0700
Message-ID: <3b31caf91003221536w22177a90v43cbce48711480c5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
> Can either the editor or other folks please provide a link
> to the threads representing the "huge outcry" from web authors?

I argued for allowing <pre> inside <figure> in 2006. The use-case I
had in mind was ASCII art.

http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2006-November/008018.html
Received on Monday, 22 March 2010 22:37:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC