- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 12:35:47 +0200
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, "'Toby Inkster'" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "'Adam Barth'" <w3c@adambarth.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:22, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > I didn't mean XSD specifically, it could be RelaxNG (as being used by the SVG committee, for example). RELAX NG is inadequate, too, but an approximation is available. > I understand that text/html(5) is not to be validated by an XML validation tool, You can use RELAX NG validator with text/html if you use an HTML parser that exposes the document tree in the way that the RELAX NG validator can consume. > but as text/xhtml(5) has to be valid and conforming XML - then I would expect some schema against which it could be validated... XHTML5 doesn't have to be valid according to a schema. It is required to meet the requirements that the HTML5 spec states in English. The spec doesn't require a particular mechanism for assessing whether content meets the requirements. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 10:36:31 UTC