Re: [Bug 5758] insufficient accessibility fallback for <audio> or <video>

On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Joe D Williams wrote:

>> accessibility fallback
>
> I think it is unfortunate that both of these words are used together  
> here. Accessibitlity is what we want when the thing is running.  
> Fallback is what we want when the thing won't run.

The history of this bug is somewhat confused. Although I am not the  
original reporter, I took the liberty of retitling it to represent the  
current state of the bug:

  "<audio> and <video> do not have sufficient support for synchronized  
alternative content for accessibility"

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Sunday, 14 March 2010 15:26:37 UTC