- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:33:26 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > I would suggest that this Working Group makes it a point to have the > RDFa WG review the Microdata specification when it goes to LC. > Similarly, this WG should make it a point to ensure that WHATWG reviews > the RDFa Core 1.1, HTML+RDFa, and RDFa DOM API specification when it > goes to LC. > > I can't imagine that the reviews are going to be overflowing with > praise, from either group, but it's the proper due diligence that should > be expected from any W3C Working Group. I can promise a review of the RDFa 1.1 spec. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 06:34:19 UTC