W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:37:25 -0600
Message-ID: <dd0fbad1003091837i7ab13507uf043f8868cc7617b@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote:
> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>
>> Shelley's intent notwithstanding, I'd still like to hear
>> from others who were part of the original discussion.
>
> I am cautiously watching what replacement language emerges, given that Ian
> has shown a willingness to work with Matt's suggestions.  I steadfastly
> maintain that the spec should reference, as the definitive go-to location,
> WCAG Success Criteria.
>
> As I recall from the last round of discussions, making this provision was
> solidly supported by the majority of those involved in the thread. (And I
> think that it is and would be wholly appropriate that the HTML WG request
> that WAI ensure that this and other sections of the Success Criteria
> document collection be maintained and updated to reflect emergent
> solutions in HTML5 and future specifications.)
>
> So for now, I am sitting on the sidelines, quietly watching for the next
> moves.

I also support this Change Proposal, though I agree with JF that
mentioning WCAG would also be a good idea.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 02:38:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC