- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:37:25 -0600
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> >> Shelley's intent notwithstanding, I'd still like to hear >> from others who were part of the original discussion. > > I am cautiously watching what replacement language emerges, given that Ian > has shown a willingness to work with Matt's suggestions. I steadfastly > maintain that the spec should reference, as the definitive go-to location, > WCAG Success Criteria. > > As I recall from the last round of discussions, making this provision was > solidly supported by the majority of those involved in the thread. (And I > think that it is and would be wholly appropriate that the HTML WG request > that WAI ensure that this and other sections of the Success Criteria > document collection be maintained and updated to reflect emergent > solutions in HTML5 and future specifications.) > > So for now, I am sitting on the sidelines, quietly watching for the next > moves. I also support this Change Proposal, though I agree with JF that mentioning WCAG would also be a good idea. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 02:38:13 UTC