Re: ISSUE-66 Change Proposal: be more explicit about potential repair techniques

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote:
> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>
>> Shelley's intent notwithstanding, I'd still like to hear
>> from others who were part of the original discussion.
>
> I am cautiously watching what replacement language emerges, given that Ian
> has shown a willingness to work with Matt's suggestions.  I steadfastly
> maintain that the spec should reference, as the definitive go-to location,
> WCAG Success Criteria.
>
> As I recall from the last round of discussions, making this provision was
> solidly supported by the majority of those involved in the thread. (And I
> think that it is and would be wholly appropriate that the HTML WG request
> that WAI ensure that this and other sections of the Success Criteria
> document collection be maintained and updated to reflect emergent
> solutions in HTML5 and future specifications.)
>
> So for now, I am sitting on the sidelines, quietly watching for the next
> moves.

I also support this Change Proposal, though I agree with JF that
mentioning WCAG would also be a good idea.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 02:38:13 UTC