- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:42:10 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 10.03.2010 16:33, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:24:59 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 10.03.2010 16:12, Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> This philosophical question could be avoided by stating that >>> documents labeled "text/html" must be processed according to HTML5. >>> ... >> >> If we did that, we'd have to make sure that this doesn't break >> existing uses. So statements like >> >> "User agents should ignore the profile content attribute on head >> elements." >> >> would need to be fixed. > > Isn't that statement true for the majority of existing usage of the > profile attribute? And therefore a SHOULD requirement is adequate? Why would a SHOULD requirement be adequate in that case? Me confused. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:42:49 UTC