- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:35:59 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Ennals, Robert" <robert.ennals@intel.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 03/20/2010 09:04 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> Or to put it another way, I don't see a compelling case here for not >> following the Decision Policy guidelines on what should go in a bug. > > To the contrary: > > 1) I believe that the data I have provided demonstrates that there > is a clear and substantial problem with the Author Conformance > Requirements. > > 2) The problem is Author Conformance Requirements. Great. Could you make sure there is a clear statement of a single problem with the spec in the bug report? Ideally the bug title would be updated to reflect that problem as well. (Note: I don't think the noun phrase "Author Conformance Requirements" is in itself a problem statement, nor is linking to a bunch of data in itself a problem statement. A statement like "Some popular sites are not conforming HTML5" plus an enumeration of said sites would be an example of a problem statement, but I'm honesty not sure at this point if that's what you think the problem is.) Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 05:36:36 UTC