W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Bug 7034

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:35:59 -0700
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Ennals, Robert" <robert.ennals@intel.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <75DA9AD0-3846-43F7-86B5-C547F234533C@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Mar 20, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> On 03/20/2010 09:04 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Or to put it another way, I don't see a compelling case here for not
>> following the Decision Policy guidelines on what should go in a bug.
> To the contrary:
> 1) I believe that the data I have provided demonstrates that there  
> is a clear and substantial problem with the Author Conformance  
> Requirements.
> 2) The problem is Author Conformance Requirements.

Great. Could you make sure there is a clear statement of a single  
problem with the spec in the bug report? Ideally the bug title would  
be updated to reflect that problem as well.

(Note: I don't think the noun phrase "Author Conformance Requirements"  
is in itself a problem statement, nor is linking to a bunch of data in  
itself a problem statement. A statement like "Some popular sites are  
not conforming HTML5" plus an enumeration of said sites would be an  
example of a problem statement, but I'm honesty not sure at this point  
if that's what you think the problem is.)

Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 05:36:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:13 UTC