W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows"

From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:43:11 +0000
Message-ID: <801031266-1268242975-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-378972021-@bda088.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>,public-html-request@w3.org,public-html@w3.org
Cc: masinter@adobe.com
FWIW I have implemented an XML workflow on my own site[1] that works just fine with processing biglot HTML5 documents with <!DOCTYPE html> (which I use as a data store) and produces text/html "safe" biglot documents.

So its certainly possible to do so. And frankly wasn't that hard (using PHP DOMDocument even). YMMV.

Tantek

[1] http://tantek.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:32:09 
To: <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: <masinter@adobe.com>
Subject: ISSUE-4: Basis of the appeal to "XML editing workflows"

I just re-read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0015.html


Point #4 talks about polyglot documents and point #10 talks about XML editing workflows.

Is there verifiable existence proof of a pre-existing XML editing workflow that:
 1) Would not work if <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> were used.
AND
 2) Already produces otherwise text/html-safe output (e.g. doesn't output <div/> or <br></br> and doesn't use namespace prefixes).
AND
 3) Would work with if the doctype <!DOCTYPE PUBLIC "-//W3C HTMLWG hixie//NONSGML HTML 20100401//EN" "about:legacy-compat"> were used.
?

(Observation: Either way, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with *versioning*--just with the ability of claimed existing XML editing workflows to deal with particular syntax.)

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/


Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 17:43:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:59 UTC