W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ISSUE 79 editorial changes

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:02:15 -0500
Message-ID: <643cc0271003231502i7189cb57id11adcdc8a2e80bf@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
2010/3/23 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>:
> Shelley Powers wrote:
>
>> I'm just amazed that we actually have to put in the HTML5 W3C
>> specification, about how to process a keyword list.
>
> The question is whether it is better to have underspecified or
> overspecified specification. ;-)
>
> (Sorry, I couldn't resist, I'm in a middle of third week of standards
> meetings in March.)
>

That sounds vaguely Shakespearean...

"It is far better to overspecify and annoy than to never specify at all."

Or perhaps, "Now is the Spring of our discontent" is more appropriate.

Or something.

Wow, third week of standards meetings. Sounds painful.


>                                Jirka
>

Shelley

> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Professional XML consulting and training services
>  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:02:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:00 UTC