- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:43:58 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Mar 9, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:29 PM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> > wrote: >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> >>> >>> Shelley's intent notwithstanding, I'd still like to hear >>> from others who were part of the original discussion. >> >> I am cautiously watching what replacement language emerges, given >> that Ian >> has shown a willingness to work with Matt's suggestions. I >> steadfastly >> maintain that the spec should reference, as the definitive go-to >> location, >> WCAG Success Criteria. >> >> As I recall from the last round of discussions, making this >> provision was >> solidly supported by the majority of those involved in the thread. >> (And I >> think that it is and would be wholly appropriate that the HTML WG >> request >> that WAI ensure that this and other sections of the Success Criteria >> document collection be maintained and updated to reflect emergent >> solutions in HTML5 and future specifications.) >> >> So for now, I am sitting on the sidelines, quietly watching for the >> next >> moves. > > I also support this Change Proposal, though I agree with JF that > mentioning WCAG would also be a good idea. Did you guys perhaps mean UAAG rather than WCAG? WCAG is about content accessibility, but this part of the spec is all about a UA repair technique. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 18:44:37 UTC