- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:19:41 +1100
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > Now I understand your point better. Personally I have been using the Change Proposal Status page to track all Tracker Issues and had not spent much time using the actual Tracker list of issues [1]. > > Note it would appear that there are several issues in the Tracker list [1] that do not have the correct "State" recorded to reflect whether they are in the RAISED or OPEN states. And there are no Trackers issues in the Pending Review state although the state name might appear to apply to when the WG is discussing one or more change proposals. > > I think the WG needs to decide how much effort we want to put into keeping the Tracker issue State correct when the information is already recorded in the Change Proposal Status page. > > Thanks for pointing out this situation. > > /paulc > > [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues > On a small side note: While we're talking about the tracker issues list and Issue-9, may I point out that the following bug listed under Issue-9 really has nothing to do with video accessibility: bug 5785 : http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5785 It's not a major issue, and the bug is already closed anyway. But if this is an authoritative list, maybe it should be fixed. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 22:20:35 UTC