- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:26:08 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > A few minor points of clarification on which documents that RDFa WG is > responsible for publishing. Some thought that I was implying that the > RDFa WG would be generating all of the "thin" specifications below. The > only two documents in the list below that the RDFa WG is chartered to > create are RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa. > > On 03/28/10 16:38, Manu Sporny wrote: >> We're going for a spec hierarchy that looks like this, with all of the >> XYZ+RDFa specs being very "thin" documents that layer on top of RDFa >> Core 1.1: >> >> +--------- HTML+RDFa >> +--------- SVG+RDFa >> RDFa Core 1.1 ----+--------- EPUB+RDFa >> +--------- ODF+RDFa >> +--------- XHTML+RDFa > > Additionally, RDFa has not yet been accepted as EPUB's metadata > expression mechanism, but it's in the running. It was mentioned as > another example of possible language integration for RDFa. > > It is understood that all other documents should be created and > controlled by their respective Working Groups. To be very specific: > > RDFa Core 1.1 - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C > HTML+RDFa - created and published by HTML WG @ W3C > SVG+RDFa - created and published by SVG WG @ W3C > EPUB+RDFa - possibly created and published by EPUB WG @ IDPF > ODF+RDFa - created and published by ODF TC @ Oasis > XHTML+RDFa - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C > > -- manu That's an impressive number of documents. RDFa's reach is certainly progressing nicely. Congrats on all of the hard work, Manu. > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Shelley
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:26:42 UTC