- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:57:13 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On 10.03.2010 15:51, Henri Sivonen wrote: > ... >> On the other hand, what concrete badness would ensue if we decide to >> allow HTML 4.01 as well? > > Authors could be mislead into using a spec that is known to be vague as a reference. But then, to believe that that's concrete badness, one needs to believe that authors pay attention to MIME type registrations... > > (I expect UA implementors to track HTML5 for implementing text/html consumption regardless of what the MIME type registration says.) > ... Right. And I don't see a problem recommending that. But that's different from what we have now. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 14:57:53 UTC