RDF Semantics: partial review
Re: RDFCore issue pfps-12
comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- proposed closuer of pfps-02, pfps-03 [[was Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document]]
question about normative status of entailment rules
ARCHITECTS
Re: Please Review: RDFCore WG new specs (2003-11-05), esp. w.r.t. I18N and XMLLiteral
rdf:RDF should be optional
status of comments pfps-02 pfps-03 pfps-04 pfps-05 pfps-06
SKINCURE info
xsd:string ang language tag
RDF Schema media type
OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
[Fwd: draft response to pfps re nfc]
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: [Fwd: draft response to pfps re nfc]
proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no)
Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no)
Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
INVESTMENT ENQUIRY
comment on current deliberations in RDF Core concerning the lexical space of XML Schema datatypes
Guilty? You Decide!
Re: Click ... click, clickclick!
RE: [Gosp_John] John 14 (Many Mansions- III)
[Gosp_John] Re: Right and Wrong Questions
[Gosp_John] Re: Light Bulbs
中国高新企业高级管理人必修课
Omissions, Errors, and Misleading Prose in the N-Triples Specification
N-Triples Unicode Ambiguity
Inconsistency in N-Triples "language" Production Case
typo in rdf semantics
issues with the 5 Sept version of RDF Semantics
proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
- Re: proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
- Re: proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
RDF test case on datatypes
yet more on RDF XML literals (and NFC)
escaping % in RDF URI references
continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
Re: Wicked screensaver
RelaxNG schema and local names
RDF model theory is now underspecified
3store RDF(S) server implementation report
[proposed close: pfps-05]
[proposed closing: pfps-04]
Multilingual text in Schema doc
updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
implementation report: Sesame and the RDF specs
support XML Literals in RDF (was Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization)
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF (was Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization)
mismatch between test and RDF/XML syntax
status of RDF tests
Re: Entailment rules development suggestion
base url for rdf test cases
Sesame compliance with RDF Test Cases of August 1
Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
problems with simple entailment rules
rdfs:member
Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
Re: unsubscribe dhump3@hotmail.com
comments on the use of normal form C
[postponed] Qu-03
Fwd: test case results needed...
Re: An rdfs:Schema Class
Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics
Re: add a triviallyTrue predicate (proposal to close LC issue danc-04)
Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules [not complete yet]
rdf:dataType="&rdf;XMLLiteral" (was: Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
danc-01rdf/xml reification examples
RDF test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf erroneously approved?
[closing?] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
Raptor 0.9.11 passes all parser tests
Re: semantics update
Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules
pfps-10 untyped literals
pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags
Impact of working group changes
Jena semantic tests
ARP passes all parser tests
pfps-09
for review: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
Bug in 'RDF-Primer'
review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
Editorial feedback on RDF Semantics document
pfps-08
pfps-06
pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
pfps-02
pfps-01
Re: daml:item
How to Describe an Authoring Service ?
A Query
[closed] re: Pan-01
Re: tex-01 case of language tag [was RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments]
RDFCore responses to XML Schema last call comments on RDF docs
RE: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes
Re: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes
[closed] xmlsch-03
[closed] xmlsch-04
[closed] xmlsch-06
[closed] xmlsch-05
[closed] xmlsch-02
[closed] xmlsch-01
[resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
[resolution]pfps-09; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
[resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
[closed] horst-01; was: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma
- Re: [closed] horst-01; was: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma
- Re: [closed] horst-01; was: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma
RE: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02
Proposal to close horst-01
[closed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [closed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [notclosed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"