- From: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aidministrator.nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:01:40 +0200
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
The RDF test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf [1] is a negative parser test for the case where an empty property element contains both an rdf:resource attribute and an rdf:bagID attribute. According to the test case this is not allowed. However, the production rule for empty property elements in the revised RDF/XML Syntax Specifiction [2] clearly states that both attributes are allowed on empty property elements. So is one of the documents wrong, or am I overlooking something? I know that rdf:bagID will be removed in the next round of updates, but still, could someone please take a look at this using the current documentation? Also, with all recent news about parsers that pass all approved test cases, which set of test cases did you use and did you spot the same problem? Regards, Arjohn Kampman [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt -- arjohn.kampman@aidministrator.nl aidministrator nederland b.v. - http://www.aidministrator.nl/ prinses julianaplein 14-b, 3817 cs amersfoort, the netherlands tel. +31-(0)33-4659987 fax. +31-(0)33-4659987
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 06:01:46 UTC