- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete] Date: 31 Jul 2003 17:05:29 +0100 [...] > > PS: It is aggravating that the pointers in RDF Semantics are not correct, > > making me over and over hunt for the correct point in RDF Concepts. > > I can understand that. Is the problem that they are absolute links to > the published version rather than the ed's drafts? > > Brian Yes, to the last-call version (or current TR version), not even to the shadow space version, and some of the anchors don't exist in this version. peter
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 12:27:44 UTC