- From: Jeff Z. Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:41:51 +0100
- To: "pat hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Brian_McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Dear Pat, Thank you for your email. [...] > I would be grateful, since time is pressing, if you could respond > directly to the question whether the WG response referred to earlier > is an adequate one to your previous comment. Along this thread of discussion, we both understand that we don't share the same opinion on some issues. I think I have made my points quite clear. Considering the timescale of the WG, I won't raise objection to the WG response. But again, I would be happy if the WG could somehow inform the users, who choose to use the non-layering style of RDFS, of the problems I mentioned in the comments. Thanks for your response so far. Best regards, Jeff -- Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester [...]
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 17:32:07 UTC