proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed

Peter, Karsten,

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ (editor's 
working copy) is now updated with our finalised Lists text. We propose
to close this LC issue on the basis of the new wording. Could you both 
reply to this message to let us know whether the current text is
acceptable and resolves your issue.

Thanks,

Dan

ps. Karsten, regarding your concern that we have both containers and 
collections, those two mechanisms are described in more detail in the
Primer, see editor's copy section 4,
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/#othercapabilities
which provides a lengthier explanation of both constructs.


* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-06-23 13:29-0400]
> From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:05:53 -0400
> 
> > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-06-18 16:04-0400]
> > > This appears to be on the right track, but I have no way of viewing the
> > > other changes, and no way of viewing the changes in context, so I don't see
> > > how I can determine whether the changes are satisfactory.
> > 
> > Fair point. The WD text has changed little since last call. I have some 
> > outstanding edits derrived from other LC comments, but nothing (to my
> > knowledge) which should impact on this issue.
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ is the 
> > LC text plus some minor edits:
> > 
> > ----------------------------
> > revision 1.12
> > date: 2003/04/11 13:58:50;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
> > Fixed typo per:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0416.html:wq
> > ----------------------------
> > revision 1.11
> > date: 2003/01/24 18:03:53;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +51 -43
> > fixed date errors.
> > ----------------------------
> > 
> > I plan to make some more modest updates in-place at that URL (with 
> > 'status' updated accordingly to avoid confusion), until we agree new URIs for 
> > the next batch of TR-published RDFCore docs.
> > 
> > My editorial todo list is based on the issue closures linked from 
> > our LC issue list, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#schema
> > 
> > I hope this clarifies the state of the doc for you. If I commit changes 
> > to the spec I'll make these explicit so you can see what's what.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > 
> > Dan
> 
> Good.  I await the changes to the appropriate sections of the document for
> final approval then.
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Bell Labs Research
> Lucent Technologies
>

Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 09:19:53 UTC