Re: [resolution]pfps-09; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes

I believe that the version of datatyping in the current editor's draft
adequately addresses this issue.

peter


From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Subject: [resolution]pfps-09; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:24:34 -0500

> Peter,
> 
> with reference to your comment
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0086.html
> 
> archived as pfps-09, I am writing to find out whether the following 
> response would be acceptable. If so, I will propose that the WG 
> accept your comment with this resolution.
> 
>   As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the 
> datatyping semantics since your comment was written.
> 
> The current editor's draft 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#dtype_interp
> now contains an account of datatyping which defines interpretations 
> relative to functions (called datatype maps) from URIrefs to 
> datatypes. This provides a way to have a URIref be a 'name' of a 
> datatype while not including the name as part of the definition of 
> the datatype itself. As the text notes, datatypes are first-class 
> individuals which can  be subject to identity reasoning in semantic 
> extensions (such as OWL).
> 
> Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, 
> indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment.
> 
> Sincerely
> 
> Pat
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 21:25:16 UTC