Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:07:05 +0300

> 
> Sorry to butt in ...
> 
> peter:
> [[
> My reading of the treatment of RDF XML literals in RDF Concepts is that
> several lexical strings can map into the same value.
> ]]
> 
> I am surprised, taking that you are working from the 28th July editor's draft, 
> that you mention earlier. The L2V mapping maps canonical sequences of Unicode 
> characetrs to their corresponding octet sequences - admittedly this caused 
> other problems pointed out by Duerst, which we are fixing. For a quite a well 
> now the l2v mapping in the concepts editors draft has been 1-1.
> 
> Jeremy
> 

Well, I certainly didn't read ``correspond'' as ``directly 1-1 encode octet
sequences that are''.  I read ``correspond'' as ``canonicalizes to'', or
some similar phrase.  I don't see ``1-1'' in the 28 July draft at all.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 16:17:04 UTC