- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:16:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, phayes@ihmc.us
From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: [proposed close: pfps-05] Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:07:05 +0300 > > Sorry to butt in ... > > peter: > [[ > My reading of the treatment of RDF XML literals in RDF Concepts is that > several lexical strings can map into the same value. > ]] > > I am surprised, taking that you are working from the 28th July editor's draft, > that you mention earlier. The L2V mapping maps canonical sequences of Unicode > characetrs to their corresponding octet sequences - admittedly this caused > other problems pointed out by Duerst, which we are fixing. For a quite a well > now the l2v mapping in the concepts editors draft has been 1-1. > > Jeremy > Well, I certainly didn't read ``correspond'' as ``directly 1-1 encode octet sequences that are''. I read ``correspond'' as ``canonicalizes to'', or some similar phrase. I don't see ``1-1'' in the 28 July draft at all. peter
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 16:17:04 UTC