- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 28 Jul 2003 16:37:56 +0100
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Thank you Peter, particularly for the timeliness of your responses. Brian On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 16:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > Subject: pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags > Date: 28 Jul 2003 16:10:14 +0100 > > > Peter, > > > > This message concerns a last call comment on the RDFCore semantics > > document recorded in: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-07 > > > > Since RDFCore previously wrote to you about this comment > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0116.html > > > > It has reconsidered its position, and decided to accept your comment and > > remove lang tags from typed literals. The current semantics editors > > draft > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > > > has been updated accordingly. > > > > Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating > > whether this is an acceptable disposition of your comment. > > > > Brian > > The change to remove language tags from typed literals makes my particular > comment moot. However, other RDF documents would need to change to support > this significant change, and this message does not give any indication of > whether these other documents have been changed appropriately. > > The new version of RDF Semantics appears to treat typed literals adequately > in this area, except for issues related to whether XML Literals are strings. > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > Lucent Technologies >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 11:43:00 UTC