>pat hayes wrote: > >[...] > >>> >>>1/ The major new issue I have with the document is the unsupported change >>>of the entailment rules from informative to normative. >> >> >>Just for the record, that change happened a few versions ago; but >>your comment is noted. > >Pat, > >We should careful about statements like that. The entailment rules >have been normantive in the editors draft for some time, but the >first *published* WD in which they were normative was that of 05 Sep >2003. Oh, sorry. I meant, a few versions ago in the set of versions that Peter had looked at. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 11:10:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:03 UTC