Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Subject: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 18:20:43 -0500

> Peter,
> 
> with reference to your comment
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0091.html
> 
> archived as pfps-04, I am writing to ask whether the following would 
> be acceptable as a response. If so, I will suggest that the WG accept 
> your comment with this resolution.
> 
>   As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the RDF 
> entailment rules since your comment was written
> 
> The current editor's draft 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html
> now contains a version of the RDF entailment rules which I believe 
> corresponds directly to the RDF semantic conditions in the sense 
> described. You can check the proof at 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#RDFEntailmentLemmaPrf
> 
> Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, 
> indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment.
> 
> Sincerely
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 

I view the current version of the RDF entailment rules (31 July) as seriously
incomplete, as the RDF entailment lemma requires use of a semantic
relationship.  Therefore, I do not feel that my concerns have been
adequately addressed.

peter

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 09:37:43 UTC