- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:22:15 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >[...] > >> Therefore for the RDF entailment rules to be complete, no XML Literal can >> have a character string as its denotation. > >Right. The denotation of an XML Literal is an octet sequence, as >defined by the xml canonicalization spec, see the note in: > > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-XMLLiteral > >Pat, does this suggest deleting from section 3 > >[[ >This terminology is deliberately agnostic as to whether or not XML data >is considered to be identical to a character string; note however that >the XML data values corresponding to well-typed XML literals are in >precise 1:1 correspondence with the XML literal strings of such >literals. >]] > >The statement you make is correct, in that the terminology is agnostic, >but its also unnecessary and maybe a little misleading. Yes, I am happy to do that. Done. I've kept the 1:1 remark - Jeremy vouches for it - as I use this in the proof appendix. http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 14:22:17 UTC