- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:19:52 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Peter, I've been reviewing the results of RDFCore's last call process and note that my status list is showing that you have not accepted some of the WG's responses on comments relating to the semantics document: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-05 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-06 Pat tells me that some progress has been made on at least some of these. Accordingly, could you please state whether any of these issues are acceptably resolved in the current RDFCore published WD: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-mt-20030905/ or in subsequent discussion. Brian
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2003 09:23:13 UTC