- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 14:45:08 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, duerst@w3.org
From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: support XML Literals in RDF Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:34:07 +0100 > On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:28:37 -0400 (EDT) > "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > > > From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> > > Subject: Re: support XML Literals in RDF > > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:59:40 +0100 > > > Not even all XML Literals that result from RDF/XML parsing will be valid > > (exc-C14N checked). For example (modulo issues with using rdf: in places > > where it really can't be used) > > > > <rdf:RDF> > > <rdf:Description> > > <http://ex.a/a#a rdf:datatype="rdf:XMLLiteral"><b/></http://ex.a/a#a> > > </rdf:Description> > > </rdf:RDF> > > That's nowhere near legal XML or RDF/XML and I can't see what you are > getting at. Please try the RDF validator to correct it and make your > point. OK, let's try <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:foo="http://a.ex/a#"> <rdf:Description> <foo:a rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral"><b/></foo:a> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> which should result in the triple _:a <http://ex.a/a#a> "<b/>"^^http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral . which has an XML Literal in non-canonical form. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:45:19 UTC