- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:10:20 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Further to your point: >There are conditions imposed on the non-core RDF vocabulary by >rdf-interpretations, counter to several claims in the document. The reason for singling out this smaller vocabulary is that this is the part of the RDF vocabulary to which semantic conditions attach that do not arise from the presence of triples in a graph. All the other 'axiomatic triples' need only be added to graphs which contain part of their vocabulary. So for example, an RDF interpretation of the graph containing the single triple <ex:a> <ex:P> <ex:b> . is required to satisfy the listed semantic constraints on rdf:Property and rdf:type, but not to satisfy any of the RDF axiomatic triples (since the graph does not use any of the RDF vocabulary). Hope this helps. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 14:10:14 UTC