- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:23:47 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org
Hello Dave, Many thanks for this work. Regards, Martin. At 10:39 03/08/15 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: >Preserving the thread, but answering just this point: > >On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:55:01 -0400 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote: > ><snip/> [on A) "<br/"> canonicalization ] > > > I agree that it would be a bad idea to try to provide an exc-C14N > > test suite. I think it would be good to add an example like this > > just to document how RDF/XML syntax, lexical value, and so on, > > are related, and in particular, that they are not exactly the same. > >The RDF Core WG has agreed to add a test to the RDF Core testcases >on this point, canonicalizing "<br/>" as "<br></br>". My proposal in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0061.html >was accepted and we chose option 1 which is as follows: > >[[ >input rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.rdf > ><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/foo"> > <eg:bar rdf:parseType="Literal"><br/></eg:bar> > </rdf:Description> ></rdf:RDF> > >output rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.nt > ><http://example.org/foo> <http://example.org/bar> >"<br></br>"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> . >]] > >Dave
Received on Friday, 15 August 2003 14:47:45 UTC